Chinese Solar Trade Association SEIA Laughs Off Chinese Illegal Trade Activity
Why does SEIA oppose tariffs on Chinese solar companies? Because it’s a front for slave labor Chinese solar manufacturers.
FORMER COMMISSIONER, US-CHINA ECONOMIC & SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION
The Honorable Patrick A. Mulloy served five two-year terms on the twelve member, bipartisan, U.S.– China Economic and Security Review Commission (see www.uscc.gov). He presently practices as a trade lawyer and consultant to groups interested in reforming U.S. trade and economic policies including the Coalition for a Prosperous America on whose Advisory Board he serves. He also served on the adjunct faculty at the Catholic University and the George Mason University Law Schools where he taught either International Trade Law or Public International Law for a number of years. He has testified before Congress on international trade and finance matters several times and served as an Assistant Secretary in the Clinton Administration in the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration. Prior to that he served as General Counsel and Chief International Counsel on the staff of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee. Earlier in his career he served as a trial lawyer in the U.S. Justice Department and a Foreign Service Officer in the U.S. State Department.
Mr. Mulloy received his LL.M from Harvard University Law School, his J.D. (with honors) from the George Washington University Law School, an M.A In International Politics from the University of Notre Dame where he was a University Fellow, and a B.A. (magna cum laude) in Government from King’s College.
Why does SEIA oppose tariffs on Chinese solar companies? Because it’s a front for slave labor Chinese solar manufacturers.
The market is in agreement: the dollar is overvalued and will likely remain that way all year.
Respected economists including Janet Yellen, Mario Draghi, Paul Romer and Angus Deaton have been critical of free trade and globalization in recent weeks.
CPA strongly supported a previous AD/CVD case filed by Auxin Solar where the Commerce Department determined that Chinese companies operating in Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Cambodia are illegally circumventing.