If someone were to break into your house and steal your TV, you’d hope the police would catch them. And if they broke in a second or third time, you’d want tough action. The last thing you would do is say, “That’s OK, I don’t mind.”
Believe it or not, however, this is exactly what has happened in recent years, as Chinese companies have repeatedly stolen critical advanced technologies from U.S. companies. In response to repeated intrusions of U.S. networks, and the hacking of proprietary high-tech secrets, past presidential administrations have simply engaged in polite “dialogue” with Beijing.
It’s been a frustrating ride for America’s manufacturers. U.S. Steel, for example, watched as a rival Chinese company stole the design for a special type of lightweight steel, then sold it at below the cost of production in the U.S. market. Chinese companies have also stolen proprietary U.S. technology for nuclear power generators, solar cells, internet software, and internet hardware. And it’s estimated that 20 percent of the wind turbines deployed in China today contain stolen software.
All of that may finally be changing, however. After a lengthy investigation into China’s hacking of U.S. companies and cyber espionage, the Trump administration has just imposed tariffs on $50 billion worth of Chinese goods. These “Section 301” tariffs — which have long been part of U.S. trade law — will focus specifically on Chinese goods produced via technology theft.
When it comes to China’s theft of high-tech property, U.S. manufacturers have a long list of grievances. And that’s because Chinese companies have not only hacked networks and stolen key technologies, but they’ve also reaped the rewards of Beijing’s “technology transfer” policies. U.S. firms attempting to sell product in China are required to “share” technology with Chinese firms — which is swiftly co-opted and sold to U.S. consumers.
The toll for U.S. manufacturers has certainly piled up. Last year, the U.S. racked up a $375 billion trade deficit with China, the biggest trade deficit between two countries in world history. And when it comes to advanced technology products (ATP), the outlook is grim. Where the U.S. ran a $5 billion ATP trade surplus in 2000, by 2017, that had shifted to a $110 billion deficit. Today, America ships raw materials and commodities to China — the opposite of what a modern developed country should be exporting.
Much of this damage has come from a naive faith in “free trade,” with economists and elected officials failing to recognize the realities of a world dominated by “strategic trade.” Beijing has formulated a”’Made in China 2025″ policy that aims to seize economic leadership in advanced technologies through predatory trade and innovation practices. The ambition and scope of Beijing’s goals is staggering. But Washington has long assumed that China will eventually seek compromise and agreement — even though Beijing’s track record clearly demonstrates otherwise. Similarly, when U.S. firms sign licensing agreements at coercively low prices as a precondition for selling in the Chinese market, it’s a devil’s bargain. It inevitably leads to U.S. companies surrendering long-term technological viability for short-term market access.
The Trump administration is wisely going beyond words and taking action on China’s aggressive theft and technology transfer. It’s a necessary step to ensure that America preserves some of the key industrial sectors expected to provide economic and technological security in the 21st Century.
It’s also imperative to reduce America’s record trade deficit with China — and future moves and countermoves are almost certain to occur, too. These actions are crucial, if the U.S. is to have a viable economy in 20 years.
Michael Stumo is CEO of the Coalition for a Prosperous America (CPA).