Trade Deficit Hits Four-Year High

February 08, 2017

By Jeff Ferry, CPA Research Director

The United States trade deficit for 2016 rose to $502.3 billion, its highest level since 2012, as a growing U.S. economy, a rising U.S. dollar, mercantilist practices by many foreign trading partners, and generally lackluster economic growth in foreign markets combined to make the trade balance a negative force in the U.S. economy.

According to U.S. Department of Commerce figures, the 2016 trade deficit was 0.4% worse than the 2015 deficit of $500.4 billion. It’s equivalent to 2.7% of last year’s GDP, estimated at $18. 567 trillion dollars, making it a significant drag on economic growth.  The U.S has now run a trade deficit for 41 consecutive years—our last trade surplus was in 1975.  

There are some bright spots in the Commerce Department’s 50-page report, but in general, the latest statistics confirm the challenge of an American manufacturing sector struggling to compete in global markets, with a depressing impact on jobs and communities that have depended on manufacturing. Our trade balance has typically consisted of a deficit on goods and a surplus on services.  Last year was no exception. The nation showed a deficit of $750.1 billion on goods, an improvement of 1.6% on the 2015 goods deficit of $762.6 billion, and a surplus on services of $247.8 billion, a decline of 5.5% from the previous year’s $262.2 billion surplus.  It’s good to have a surplus on services, but services (comprising items like financial services, insurance, and tourism) are less labor-intensive than goods. So our deficit on goods eliminates many more jobs than our surplus on services creates.

One of the strongest trends in our trade flows in recent years has been the rise in domestic production of petroleum-related products, which is reducing our dependence on imported fossil fuels. In 2016, our trade deficit in such products improved substantially from $84.6 billion to $56.8 billion. Many experts expect us to reach balance and then become a net exporter of petroleum products in the near future. However, the bad news is that our non-petroleum goods trade deficit actually worsened in 2016, moving from negative $661.1 billion in 2015 to negative $677.5 billion last year.

Aerospace Better, InfoTech Flat

One bright spot in the trade figures was aerospace, where our trade surplus surged, up 9% from $78.7 billion in 2015 to $85.8 billion last year. The improvement in aerospace helped drive the broader category of Advanced Technology Products (ATP) better, from a 2015 deficit of $91.8 billion to a 2016 deficit of $83.1 billion. The ATP sector is dominated by information technology, called Information and Communications by Commerce, and our deficit there improved slightly to reach a still-huge $140.6 billion in 2016. This huge deficit in InfoTech, a sector where the U.S. leads the world, graphically illustrates the challenge we have to turn our innovation and stock market success into export success.

Finally, a look at which countries the U.S. has the largest bilateral deficits with shows little change. China continues to occupy the leading position, although our bilateral deficit with China has improved by $20 billion to $347.0 billion. Germany fell slightly, now ranking third in the list. Our deficit with Mexico worsened by $2.5 billion in 2016. The slight deterioration in our trade with Mexico was reinforced by a similar slight deterioration in our trade in the auto vehicles and parts sector, where our deficit worsened from $197.2 billion in 2015 to $200.3 billion last year. Mexico and the auto sector are two hot-button issues in Washington these days.

With a U.S. trade deficit stuck at half a trillion dollars a year, our trade deficit is larger than the entire GDP of all but 21 countries in the world.  The huge trade deficit continues to hollow out U.S. manufacturing industry and depress real incomes in many parts of the country. All eyes are on the Trump Administration to see if it takes the decisive actions candidate Trump promised repeatedly in the election campaign.





Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Robbie Jena
    History repeats itself. Our Kings (Presidents) and Barons (Lawyer-Politicians) are at it since 60’s. Hence we are not going anywhere but Wars. We need well after WWII to 60s, because the planet was dead. But slowly History moved the Asia up that we could not figure out the competition…so now what…war ?…since we do not understand Complexity Management?
  • William Ryan
    This is a really sad economic picture to look at when considering that for the past 40 years all the presidents we had during that time period chose to do nothing about it because it was not politically correct to do so. Finally today we get Trump into office because he wants do something about it and many other unpopular issues but is sustaining a huge political backlash like we’ve never before seen. The word “can’t” is not in Trumps dictionary and we must not forget the untold and forgotten human side to this story of all the job losses.
  • Robbie Jena
    Trade Deficit is going on for many many years. Lawyer-Politicians do not know what it is, let alone fix it. It is a very complex matter and no Engineers get involved let alone Marketing people. This one post would not do much either. I tried from Pres. Obama that did not go anywhere. Nice letter from Mrs. Obama. Same for most Politicians who said, I should talk to my local one. So, enjoy the Chaos that is coming.